A Case for NOW (Networks of Workstations)
Cheaper computers are attractive to a larger market, thus are manufactured in much larger volume, which means that manufacturers can amortize the massive development costs.
Smaller computers offer a better cost/performance ratio than larger ones.
Compare MPP (supercomputer) to workstataions:
- MPP systems tend to lag 1~2 years behind workstations. At 50% performance imporvement per year, a two-year lag costs more than a factor of two in the bottom-line computational performance.
- MPP requires extra work on software side.
- MPP has advantage on communication performance and provides a global system view
Motivation of NOW by then:
- Faster network
- More powerful workstation
- Disks are bigger but still slow
Opportunities for NOW
- Distributed shared memory (FaRM today)
- Cooperutztefile caching (Distributed file systems today?)
- RAID over network (Storage servers today)
- Parallel computing (today)
Same today:
- Lean communication layers reduces software overhead.
- Commodity hardware is cheaper and easier to use. Specialized hardware takes longer time to develop and requires software adaption but (perhaps?) provides better performance.
- Smartphones / iPads are more popular than computers.
© 2020 ScratchPad ― Powered by Jekyll and Textlog theme